Health and supplement content carries real-world consequences. NEXRY follows a defined editorial standard so every claim is supported, sourced, and reviewed.
We prioritise systematic reviews and meta-analyses, then randomised controlled trials, then mechanism studies. Single-arm and observational studies are flagged as lower-tier evidence. We do not cite non-peer-reviewed media as primary sources.
Every science, ingredient, and learn article is drafted by a nutrition or health writer, fact-checked against the cited primary sources, then reviewed by a qualified scientific or medical reviewer (where applicable) before publishing. Reviewer name and date appear at the bottom of every reviewed page.
Articles are re-reviewed at least every 12 months, or sooner when new high-tier evidence emerges. The 'Last reviewed' date is displayed on every page.
Reviewers must disclose any financial or product relationships. We do not commission reviews where a reviewer holds a material conflict relevant to the topic.
We avoid disease, treatment and cure claims. We use 'supports', 'helps maintain' and 'formulated with ingredients used in published research' style framing in line with EU EFSA, US FTC and equivalent regional advertising codes.
If you spot an error, email corrections@getnexry.com. We publicly note corrections at the bottom of the affected article.
